"London is more than its museums and landmarks. It's a living, breathing, thriving organism... a coral reek of humanity."
Construction is everywhere in anticipation of the 2012 Olympics. It's funny - we went to Athens (2001) and Beijing (2006) before they hosted Olympics as well. I guess the advertisers have done their job well! I was surprised at how "un-English" it really is here. English seems to be the city's second language and the visible minority population is vast. The whole city seems foreign, yet comfortable for me. I believe the diverse population had a big influence on this. Although it is great to see the Big Ben's and Westminster Abbey's to say you've been there (and London has enough landmarks and museums to fill your plate non-stop for 2 weeks), like always though our fondest memories will be the sights and sounds of the people we have met during "normal life" that we will remember.
I've heard many reviews from people that have been to both London and Paris and each one seems to love one OR the other. Never both. I'm interested to find out the differences. Well, I love London and have really high hopes for Paris. I hope that I will be the first.
Siew and I have been fortunate enough to go to some of the world's "mega cities" which I consider metro areas of at least 5 million (or the top 50 metro areas in the world by population). Here is a list that I like to refer to. It's always interesting to see how each country and culture adapts to staggering numbers of people. Some examples of places that Siew and I have been to together that fall into this category are: Tokyo, Osaka/Kobe, Shanghai, Beijing, L.A., and Toronto. Right now - I'd rank London in my top 3 with Osaka/Kobe holding the top spot. If there was one knock on London is that the food is mediocre, which is one area that I value a lot. Not bad. Not spectacular. Just middle of the road. Maybe it's because we're relying on Chowhound too much, but I've had better Indian in Calgary (yikes!) and better Asian in Richmond (which is world class). On the flip side though - the traditional pub fare is truly remarkable. That being said, there is only so much my stomach can take of constant deep fried food.
Since I've been trying to be diligent in posting reviews, I thought I'd post two distinct top 5 lists. One - if I were visiting without kids. The other - if you do have little ones which really focuses on interesting things to keep the kids engaged while satisfying your craving for some culture at the same time. Note that this includes only stuff that we actually got to do.
Top 5 of London Without Kids
- Tower of London - The best all-around attraction in London steeped in history and a boat load of cool activities.
- British Museum - The best museum in the world. Period.
- St.Paul's Cathedral - Da Vinci Codish atmosphere really adds to the impact of the place.
- Westminster Abbey - Organ recital will be one of my fond memories. Stained glass work is out of this world.
- Natural History Museum - The best of its kind and the second best museum I've seen in London.
Top 5 of London With Kids
- Hyde Park - Between the wide open spaces, and the playgrounds and Palaces, it is the best way to enjoy a nice day out with your kids in London.
- Tower of London - Jewels, Torture, Amour, Swords, and Cannons. If this doesn't do the sell job for your kids nothing will.
- London Eye - Impossible for the kids NOT to like an over-sized ferris wheel right?
- Natural History Museum - Dinosaurs are the star, but there is something for every kid - and all displays are world class.
- Science Museum - Despite it's confusing mish mash of stuff, all will keep your kids busy for a loooooooooong time.